Implement repository pattern for AuditLog entity for Sprint 2 Story 1 Task 2.
Changes:
- Created IAuditLogRepository interface with 6 query methods
- Implemented AuditLogRepository with efficient querying
- Registered repository in DI container
- All queries use AsNoTracking for read-only operations
Query Methods:
- GetByIdAsync: Get single audit log by ID
- GetByEntityAsync: Get audit history for specific entity
- GetByUserAsync: Get user activity with pagination
- GetRecentAsync: Get recent audit logs
- AddAsync: Add new audit log
- GetCountAsync: Get total audit log count
Performance:
- All queries automatically filtered by TenantId (Global Query Filter)
- Efficient use of composite indexes
- AsNoTracking for read-only operations
Testing:
- All tests passing (192 domain + 113 identity + 8 arch + 32 app + 12 infra = 357 tests)
- No compilation errors
- Zero test failures
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
SECURITY FIX: Prevent intra-tenant unauthorized project access
Problem:
Users within the same tenant could join ANY project room via SignalR
without permission checks, causing potential data leakage. The TODO
at line 18 in ProjectHub.cs left this critical validation unimplemented.
Solution:
- Created IProjectPermissionService interface for permission checking
- Implemented ProjectPermissionService with owner-based validation
- Added permission validation to ProjectHub.JoinProject() and LeaveProject()
- Returns clear HubException if user lacks permission
- Multi-tenant isolation enforced via PMDbContext query filters
Implementation Details:
1. IProjectPermissionService.IsUserProjectMemberAsync() checks if user
is the project owner (currently based on Project.OwnerId)
2. Service registered as Scoped in DI container via ModuleExtensions
3. ProjectHub throws HubException with clear error message for unauthorized access
4. TODO comments added for future ProjectMember table implementation
Files Changed:
- Added: IProjectPermissionService.cs (Application layer interface)
- Added: ProjectPermissionService.cs (Infrastructure layer implementation)
- Modified: ProjectHub.cs (permission checks in JoinProject/LeaveProject)
- Modified: ModuleExtensions.cs (service registration)
Testing:
- All existing tests pass (437 tests, 0 failures)
- Build succeeds with no errors
- Multi-tenant isolation preserved via DbContext filters
Future Enhancement:
When ProjectMember table is implemented, extend permission check to:
return project.OwnerId == userId ||
await _dbContext.ProjectMembers.AnyAsync(pm =>
pm.ProjectId == projectId && pm.UserId == userId)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Created comprehensive integration test suite for Issue Management Module with 8 test cases covering all CRUD operations, status changes, assignments, and multi-tenant isolation.
Test Cases (8/8):
1. Create Issue (Story type)
2. Create Issue (Task type)
3. Create Issue (Bug type)
4. Get Issue by ID
5. List Issues
6. Change Issue Status (Kanban workflow)
7. Assign Issue to User
8. Multi-Tenant Isolation (CRITICAL security test)
Bug Fix: Multi-Tenant Data Leakage
- Issue: IssueRepository did not filter by TenantId, allowing cross-tenant data access
- Solution: Implemented TenantContext service and added TenantId filtering to all repository queries
- Security Impact: CRITICAL - prevents unauthorized access to other tenants' issues
Changes:
- Added ColaFlow.Modules.IssueManagement.IntegrationTests project
- Added IssueManagementWebApplicationFactory for test infrastructure
- Added TestAuthHelper for JWT token generation in tests
- Added 8 comprehensive integration tests
- Added ITenantContext and TenantContext services for tenant isolation
- Updated IssueRepository to filter all queries by current tenant ID
- Registered TenantContext in module DI configuration
Test Status: 7/8 passed initially, 8/8 expected after multi-tenant fix
Test Framework: xUnit + FluentAssertions + WebApplicationFactory
Database: In-Memory (for fast, isolated tests)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Implement environment-aware dependency injection to resolve EF Core provider conflict
in Integration Tests. The issue was caused by both PostgreSQL and InMemory providers
being registered in the same service provider.
Changes:
- Modified Identity Module DependencyInjection to skip PostgreSQL DbContext registration in Testing environment
- Modified ProjectManagement Module ModuleExtensions with same environment check
- Updated Program.cs to pass IHostEnvironment to both module registration methods
- Added Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions package to Identity.Infrastructure project
- Updated ColaFlowWebApplicationFactory to set Testing environment and register InMemory databases
- Simplified WebApplicationFactory by removing complex RemoveAll logic
Results:
- All 31 Integration Tests now run (previously only 1 ran)
- No EF Core provider conflict errors
- 23 tests pass, 8 tests fail (failures are business logic issues, not infrastructure)
- Production environment still uses PostgreSQL as expected
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
