# ColaFlow Day 5 QA Test Report ## Comprehensive Integration Testing: Refresh Token + RBAC + Regression **Date**: 2025-11-03 **QA Engineer**: ColaFlow QA Agent **Test Environment**: Windows 10, .NET 9.0, PostgreSQL **API Version**: Day 5 Implementation **Test Duration**: ~15 minutes --- ## Executive Summary **Test Status**: CRITICAL FAILURES DETECTED **Pass Rate**: 57.14% (8/14 tests passed) **Deployment Recommendation**: **DO NOT DEPLOY** (RED) ### Critical Issues - 6 tests failed with **500 Internal Server Error** - `/api/auth/refresh` endpoint completely broken - `/api/auth/login` endpoint completely broken - Root cause: Missing database migrations or table schema issues ### Positive Findings - 8 core tests passed successfully - BUG-002 (database foreign key constraints) appears to be fixed - Registration endpoint working correctly - JWT generation and claims working correctly - RBAC role assignment working correctly --- ## Test Execution Summary | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | **Total Tests** | 14 | | **Passed** | 8 | | **Failed** | 6 | | **Pass Rate** | 57.14% | | **Blockers** | 2 (Refresh, Login) | --- ## Detailed Test Results Matrix ### Phase 1: Refresh Token Tests (7 tests) | Test ID | Test Name | Status | Result | Notes | |---------|-----------|--------|--------|-------| | RT-001 | Register Tenant - Get Tokens | PASS | 200 OK | Returns accessToken + refreshToken | | RT-002 | Access Protected Endpoint | PASS | 200 OK | /api/auth/me works with JWT | | RT-003 | Refresh Access Token | **FAIL** | **500 Error** | BLOCKER - Cannot refresh tokens | | RT-004 | Token Reuse Detection | **FAIL** | **500 Error** | Cannot test - depends on RT-003 | | RT-005 | New Access Token Works | **FAIL** | **401 Error** | Cannot test - no new token generated | | RT-006 | Logout (Revoke Token) | PASS | 200 OK | Token revocation works | | RT-007 | Revoked Token Rejected | PASS | 401 | Revoked tokens correctly rejected | **Phase 1 Pass Rate**: 4/7 = 57.14% ### Phase 2: RBAC Tests (5 tests) | Test ID | Test Name | Status | Result | Notes | |---------|-----------|--------|--------|-------| | RBAC-001 | Register Tenant (RBAC) | PASS | 200 OK | Tenant registered successfully | | RBAC-002 | Verify TenantOwner Role | PASS | 200 OK | Role correctly assigned | | RBAC-003 | Role Persistence (Login) | **FAIL** | **500 Error** | BLOCKER - Login endpoint broken | | RBAC-004 | Role Preserved (Refresh) | **FAIL** | **500 Error** | Blocked by refresh endpoint | | RBAC-005 | JWT Claims Inspection | PASS | 200 OK | All claims present | **Phase 2 Pass Rate**: 3/5 = 60% ### Phase 3: Regression Tests (2 tests) | Test ID | Test Name | Status | Result | Notes | |---------|-----------|--------|--------|-------| | REG-001 | Password Hashing (Day 4) | **FAIL** | **500 Error** | Blocked by login endpoint | | REG-002 | JWT Authentication (Day 4) | PASS | 200 OK | JWT auth still works | **Phase 3 Pass Rate**: 1/2 = 50% --- ## Critical Bugs Found ### BUG-003: Refresh Token Endpoint Returns 500 Error **Severity**: CRITICAL **Priority**: P0 - Fix Immediately **Status**: Open **Affected Endpoint**: `POST /api/auth/refresh` **Description**: The `/api/auth/refresh` endpoint consistently returns 500 Internal Server Error when attempting to refresh a valid refresh token. **Steps to Reproduce**: 1. Register a new tenant via `POST /api/tenants/register` 2. Extract `refreshToken` from response 3. Call `POST /api/auth/refresh` with body: `{"refreshToken": ""}` 4. Observe 500 error **Expected Result**: 200 OK with new accessToken and refreshToken **Actual Result**: ```json { "type": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.6.1", "title": "Internal Server Error", "status": 500, "detail": "An unexpected error occurred.", "instance": "/api/auth/refresh", "traceId": "00-43347aab2f3a768a0cc09eec975b378a-b81b31c537809552-00" } ``` **Impact**: - Users cannot refresh their access tokens - Users will be forced to re-login every 15 minutes - Token rotation security feature is completely broken - **Blocks all Day 5 Phase 1 functionality** **Root Cause Analysis**: Likely causes (in order of probability): 1. **Missing database table**: `refresh_tokens` table may not exist 2. **Missing migration**: Database schema not up to date 3. **Database connection issue**: Connection string or permissions 4. **EF Core configuration**: Entity mapping issue **Recommended Fix**: 1. Run database migrations: `dotnet ef database update` 2. Verify `refresh_tokens` table exists in database 3. Check application logs for detailed exception stack trace 4. Verify `RefreshTokenRepository` can save/query tokens --- ### BUG-004: Login Endpoint Returns 500 Error **Severity**: CRITICAL **Priority**: P0 - Fix Immediately **Status**: Open **Affected Endpoint**: `POST /api/auth/login` **Description**: The `/api/auth/login` endpoint returns 500 Internal Server Error when attempting to login with valid credentials. **Steps to Reproduce**: 1. Register a new tenant 2. Attempt to login with the same credentials 3. Call `POST /api/auth/login` with: ```json { "tenantSlug": "test-1234", "email": "admin@test.com", "password": "Admin@1234" } ``` 4. Observe 500 error **Expected Result**: 200 OK with accessToken, refreshToken, user, and tenant data **Actual Result**: ```json { "status": 500, "title": "Internal Server Error", "instance": "/api/auth/login", "traceId": "00-e608d77cce3ed7e30eb99296f4746755-12a1329633f83ec7-00" } ``` **Impact**: - Users cannot login after registration - **Blocks all returning users** - Password persistence testing impossible - Role persistence testing impossible - **Blocks Day 5 Phase 2 and Phase 3 tests** **Root Cause Analysis**: Same as BUG-003 - likely the `GenerateRefreshTokenAsync` call in `LoginCommandHandler` is failing due to missing `refresh_tokens` table. **Location**: `LoginCommandHandler.cs` line 74-78: ```csharp // 6. Generate refresh token var refreshToken = await _refreshTokenService.GenerateRefreshTokenAsync( user, ipAddress: null, userAgent: null, cancellationToken); ``` **Recommended Fix**: Same as BUG-003 - ensure database migrations are applied. --- ## Passed Tests Summary ### Working Functionality (8 tests passed) 1. **Tenant Registration** ✅ - Endpoint: `POST /api/tenants/register` - Returns: accessToken, refreshToken, user, tenant - JWT claims correctly populated 2. **JWT Authentication** ✅ - Endpoint: `GET /api/auth/me` - Requires: Bearer token in Authorization header - Returns: user_id, tenant_id, email, tenant_role, role 3. **RBAC Role Assignment** ✅ - TenantOwner role automatically assigned during registration - JWT contains `tenant_role` claim = "TenantOwner" - JWT contains `role` claim = "TenantOwner" 4. **JWT Claims** ✅ - All required claims present: - `user_id` - `tenant_id` - `email` - `full_name` - `tenant_slug` - `tenant_role` (NEW) - `role` (NEW) 5. **Token Revocation** ✅ - Endpoint: `POST /api/auth/logout` - Successfully revokes refresh tokens - Revoked tokens correctly rejected (401) 6. **BUG-002 Fix Verified** ✅ - Foreign key constraints working - No duplicate columns (`user_id1`, `tenant_id1`) - Registration commits successfully to database --- ## Validation Against Day 5 Acceptance Criteria ### Phase 1: Refresh Token (15 criteria) | Criterion | Status | Notes | |-----------|--------|-------| | Register returns refreshToken | ✅ PASS | Token returned in response | | Login returns refreshToken | ❌ FAIL | Login endpoint broken (500) | | Access token 15 min expiry | ⚠️ SKIP | Cannot test - refresh broken | | Refresh token 7 day expiry | ⚠️ SKIP | Cannot test - refresh broken | | Token refresh returns new pair | ❌ FAIL | Refresh endpoint broken (500) | | Old refreshToken invalidated | ❌ FAIL | Cannot test - refresh broken | | Token reuse detection works | ❌ FAIL | Cannot test - refresh broken | | Logout revokes token | ✅ PASS | Revocation working | | Logout-all revokes all tokens | ⚠️ SKIP | Not tested | | Revoked token rejected | ✅ PASS | 401 returned correctly | | Token stored hashed (SHA-256) | ⚠️ SKIP | Cannot verify - DB access needed | | Token rotation on refresh | ❌ FAIL | Refresh broken | | IP address tracking | ⚠️ SKIP | Cannot verify | | User agent tracking | ⚠️ SKIP | Cannot verify | | Device info tracking | ⚠️ SKIP | Cannot verify | **Phase 1 Pass Rate**: 3/15 = 20% (6 failed, 6 skipped) ### Phase 2: RBAC (6 criteria) | Criterion | Status | Notes | |-----------|--------|-------| | TenantOwner role assigned | ✅ PASS | Automatic assignment working | | JWT contains tenant_role | ✅ PASS | Claim present | | JWT contains role | ✅ PASS | Claim present | | /me returns role info | ✅ PASS | tenantRole and role returned | | Role persists across login | ❌ FAIL | Login broken (500) | | Refresh preserves role | ❌ FAIL | Refresh broken (500) | **Phase 2 Pass Rate**: 4/6 = 66.67% ### Overall Acceptance Criteria Pass Rate **21 Total Criteria**: - ✅ Passed: 7 (33.33%) - ❌ Failed: 8 (38.10%) - ⚠️ Skipped/Blocked: 6 (28.57%) --- ## Performance Metrics | Endpoint | Average Response Time | Status | |----------|----------------------|--------| | POST /api/tenants/register | ~300ms | ✅ Good | | GET /api/auth/me | ~50ms | ✅ Excellent | | POST /api/auth/logout | ~150ms | ✅ Good | | POST /api/auth/refresh | N/A | ❌ Broken | | POST /api/auth/login | N/A | ❌ Broken | **Note**: Performance testing incomplete due to endpoint failures. --- ## Quality Gates Assessment ### Release Criteria (Day 5) | Criterion | Target | Actual | Status | |-----------|--------|--------|--------| | P0/P1 bugs | 0 | **2** | ❌ FAIL | | Test pass rate | ≥ 95% | **57.14%** | ❌ FAIL | | Code coverage | ≥ 80% | Unknown | ⚠️ Not measured | | API response P95 | < 500ms | N/A | ⚠️ Blocked | | E2E critical flows | 100% | **0%** | ❌ FAIL | **Quality Gate**: **FAILED** - DO NOT RELEASE --- ## Deployment Recommendation ### 🔴 DO NOT DEPLOY **Rationale**: 1. **2 Critical (P0) bugs** blocking core functionality 2. **57% pass rate** - far below 95% threshold 3. **Login completely broken** - no user can login after registration 4. **Token refresh broken** - users forced to re-login every 15 minutes 5. **38% of acceptance criteria failed** 6. **All E2E critical user flows broken** ### Blocking Issues Summary **Must Fix Before Deployment**: 1. ❌ BUG-003: Fix `/api/auth/refresh` endpoint 2. ❌ BUG-004: Fix `/api/auth/login` endpoint 3. ❌ Run database migrations 4. ❌ Verify `refresh_tokens` table exists 5. ❌ Re-run full test suite to verify fixes ### Estimated Fix Time - **Database migration**: 5 minutes - **Verification testing**: 10 minutes - **Total**: ~15 minutes **Next Steps**: 1. Backend engineer: Run `dotnet ef database update` 2. Backend engineer: Verify database schema 3. QA: Re-run full test suite 4. QA: Verify all 14 tests pass 5. QA: Update deployment recommendation --- ## Test Evidence ### Diagnostic Test Output ``` === DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Token Refresh 500 Error === 1. Registering tenant... Success! Got tokens Access Token: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6Ik... Refresh Token: b0h6KiuoyWGOzD6fP6dG5qx+btViK1... 2. Attempting token refresh... FAILED: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error. Status Code: 500 Response Body: { "type":"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.6.1", "title":"Internal Server Error", "status":500, "detail":"An unexpected error occurred.", "instance":"/api/auth/refresh", "traceId":"00-43347aab2f3a768a0cc09eec975b378a-b81b31c537809552-00" } 3. Attempting login... FAILED: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error. Status Code: 500 Response Body: { "status":500, "title":"Internal Server Error", "instance":"/api/auth/login", "traceId":"00-e608d77cce3ed7e30eb99296f4746755-12a1329633f83ec7-00" } ``` ### Sample Successful Test **Test**: Register Tenant + Verify Role ```powershell # Request POST http://localhost:5167/api/tenants/register { "tenantName": "RBAC Test Corp", "tenantSlug": "rbac-8945", "subscriptionPlan": "Professional", "adminEmail": "rbac@test.com", "adminPassword": "Admin@1234", "adminFullName": "RBAC Admin" } # Response 200 OK { "accessToken": "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs...", "refreshToken": "CscU32NXsuAkYrDovkdm...", "user": { "id": "...", "email": "rbac@test.com" }, "tenant": { "id": "...", "slug": "rbac-8945" } } # Verify Role GET http://localhost:5167/api/auth/me Authorization: Bearer # Response 200 OK { "userId": "...", "tenantId": "...", "email": "rbac@test.com", "tenantRole": "TenantOwner", ✅ "role": "TenantOwner", ✅ "claims": [...] } ``` --- ## Recommendations ### Immediate Actions (Before Next Test Run) 1. **Database Migrations** ```bash cd colaflow-api dotnet ef database update --project src/ColaFlow.API ``` 2. **Verify Database Schema** ```sql -- Check if refresh_tokens table exists SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = 'identity' AND table_name = 'refresh_tokens'; -- Verify columns SELECT column_name, data_type FROM information_schema.columns WHERE table_schema = 'identity' AND table_name = 'refresh_tokens'; ``` 3. **Check Application Logs** - Review console output for stack traces - Look for EF Core exceptions - Verify database connection string ### Code Review Findings **Positive**: - ✅ Service implementations are well-structured - ✅ Dependency injection properly configured - ✅ Error handling in controllers - ✅ Security best practices (token hashing, secure random generation) - ✅ RBAC implementation follows design **Concerns**: - ⚠️ No database migration scripts found - ⚠️ No explicit database initialization in startup - ⚠️ Exception details hidden in production (good for security, bad for debugging) ### Testing Recommendations 1. **Add Health Check Endpoint** ```csharp [HttpGet("health/database")] public async Task HealthCheck() { var canConnect = await _dbContext.Database.CanConnectAsync(); return Ok(new { database = canConnect }); } ``` 2. **Add Integration Tests** - Unit tests for `RefreshTokenService` - Integration tests for database operations - E2E tests for critical user flows 3. **Improve Error Logging** - Log full exception details to console in Development - Include stack traces in trace logs --- ## Conclusion The Day 5 implementation shows good progress on RBAC and basic authentication, but **critical failures in the refresh token and login endpoints block deployment**. The root cause appears to be **missing database migrations** rather than code defects. The code quality is good, and the architecture is sound. **Once the database schema is updated and migrations are applied, a full re-test is required before deployment can be approved.** --- ## Test Artifacts **Test Scripts**: - `c:\Users\yaoji\git\ColaCoder\product-master\colaflow-api\qa-day5-test.ps1` - `c:\Users\yaoji\git\ColaCoder\product-master\colaflow-api\diagnose-500-errors.ps1` **Test Results**: - Pass Rate: 57.14% (8/14) - Critical Bugs: 2 - Deployment Recommendation: DO NOT DEPLOY **Next QA Milestone**: Re-test after backend fixes database schema --- **Report Generated**: 2025-11-03 **QA Engineer**: ColaFlow QA Agent **Status**: CRITICAL ISSUES - DEPLOYMENT BLOCKED