fix(review): 验收冲突显示与闸门对齐 — 验收报 CONFLICT_UNRESOLVED 时回拉最新审稿并回灌冲突；未审稿不再误显「可直接验收」

apps/web/components/review/AcceptPanel.tsx

@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ import { ThinkingIndicator } from "@/components/ThinkingIndicator";
 interface AcceptPanelProps {
   projectId: string;
   chapterNo: number;
+  // 本页是否已有审稿结果（进页带留痕 或 本次重审完成）。用于区分
+  // 「审过且 0 冲突→可直接验收」与「未审稿→先审稿」，避免把"未知"当"无冲突"。
+  reviewed: boolean;
   conflictCount: number;
   unresolvedCount: number;
   // R3：当前伏笔建议数（验收前清单提醒，只读不自动落库）。
@@ -22,6 +25,7 @@ interface AcceptPanelProps {
 export function AcceptPanel({
   projectId,
   chapterNo,
+  reviewed,
   conflictCount,
   unresolvedCount,
   foreshadowCount,
@@ -89,7 +93,9 @@ export function AcceptPanel({
         <>
           <p className="mb-2 text-xs text-ink-soft">
             {conflictCount === 0
-              ? "无冲突，可直接验收。"
+              ? reviewed
+                ? "无冲突，可直接验收。"
+                : "尚未审稿——建议先点「重新审稿」确认本章无冲突，再验收。"
               : "全部冲突已裁决，可验收本章。"}
           </p>
           {/* R3：验收前「本次将更新」清单（预期，落库口径以验收回执为准）。 */}

apps/web/components/review/ReviewReport.tsx

@@ -16,10 +16,12 @@ import {
   type Verdict,
 } from "@/lib/review/decisions";
 import {
+  latestReview,
   normalizeConflicts,
   normalizeForeshadowSug,
   normalizePace,
 } from "@/lib/review/history";
+import { api } from "@/lib/api/client";
 import {
   displayOrder,
   groupConflicts,
@@ -315,8 +317,26 @@ export function ReviewReport({
       finalText,
       drafts,
     );
-    if (outcome.missingIndices.length > 0) {
-      setMissing(new Set(outcome.missingIndices));
+    if (!outcome.conflictUnresolved) {
+      if (outcome.missingIndices.length > 0) {
+        setMissing(new Set(outcome.missingIndices));
+      }
+      return;
+    }
+    // 验收闸读的是「持久化的最新审稿」；本页冲突可能为空/过期（显示 0 冲突却被拦）。
+    // 回拉最新审稿留痕 → 回灌冲突 + 重置裁决草稿，把「看不见的冲突」显式呈现供裁决。
+    const { data } = await api.GET(
+      "/projects/{project_id}/chapters/{chapter_no}/reviews",
+      { params: { path: { project_id: project.id, chapter_no: chapterNo } } },
+    );
+    const fresh = normalizeConflicts(latestReview(data?.reviews));
+    setMissing(new Set(outcome.missingIndices));
+    if (fresh.length > 0) {
+      review.seed({ conflicts: fresh, foreshadow, pace, style });
+      setDrafts(emptyDecisions(fresh.length));
+      toast("审稿报告已刷新：检测到未裁决冲突，请裁决后再验收", "error");
+    } else {
+      toast("尚有冲突未裁决，请先「重新审稿」查看", "error");
     }
   };
 
@@ -520,6 +540,7 @@ export function ReviewReport({
             <AcceptPanel
               projectId={project.id}
               chapterNo={chapterNo}
+              reviewed={initialReview !== undefined || review.state.phase === "done"}
               conflictCount={conflictCount}
               unresolvedCount={resolved ? 0 : unresolved}
               foreshadowCount={foreshadow.length}

apps/web/lib/review/useAccept.ts

@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ export interface AcceptOutcome {
   result: AcceptResponse | null;
   // 409 CONFLICT_UNRESOLVED 缺判下标（高亮报告卡）。
   missingIndices: number[];
+  // 后端验收闸报「有未裁决冲突」——即便本页当前未显示冲突（快照过期/未审稿）。
+  // 调用方据此回拉持久化最新审稿、回灌冲突供裁决（修「显示 0 冲突却被拦」）。
+  conflictUnresolved: boolean;
 }
 
 export interface UseAccept {
@@ -58,16 +61,15 @@ export function useAccept(): UseAccept {
         const code = env?.error?.code;
         const missing = env?.error?.details?.missing_conflict_indices ?? [];
         if (code === "CONFLICT_UNRESOLVED") {
-          toast("尚有冲突未裁决，请先处理高亮项", "error");
-          return { result: null, missingIndices: missing };
+          return { result: null, missingIndices: missing, conflictUnresolved: true };
         }
         toast("验收失败，请重试（正文未丢失）", "error");
-        return { result: null, missingIndices: [] };
+        return { result: null, missingIndices: [], conflictUnresolved: false };
       }
       setResult(data);
       setStatus("accepted");
       toast("本章已验收", "success");
-      return { result: data, missingIndices: [] };
+      return { result: data, missingIndices: [], conflictUnresolved: false };
     },
     [toast],
   );