🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
1943 lines
54 KiB
Markdown
1943 lines
54 KiB
Markdown
# ColaFlow Feature Breakdown Document
|
|
|
|
**Version:** 1.0
|
|
**Date:** 2025-11-02
|
|
**Purpose:** Detailed breakdown of features into Epics, Stories, and Tasks
|
|
**Status:** Draft
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Document Structure
|
|
|
|
This document breaks down ColaFlow features across the 6 milestones (M1-M6) into:
|
|
- **Epics**: Large features or initiatives
|
|
- **Stories**: User-facing capabilities
|
|
- **Tasks**: Specific implementation work items
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**: Definition of done for each story
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## M1: Core Project Management Module (Months 1-2)
|
|
|
|
### Epic 1.1: Project Hierarchy & Structure
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Implement the foundational data model and UI for managing projects, epics, stories, and tasks.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Essential foundation for all project management capabilities.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.1.1: Create Project Entity Model
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** create and manage projects
|
|
**So that** I can organize work into logical containers
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can create project with name, key, description, owner
|
|
- ✅ Project key is unique and auto-generated (e.g., COLA-123)
|
|
- ✅ Can set project status (Active, On Hold, Completed, Archived)
|
|
- ✅ Can add team members with roles (Admin, Member, Viewer)
|
|
- ✅ Project metadata includes created/updated timestamps and creator
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.1.1: Design PostgreSQL schema for projects table
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.1.2: Create Prisma models and migrations
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.1.3: Implement ProjectService with CRUD operations
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.1.4: Build REST API endpoints (POST /projects, GET /projects/:id, etc.)
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.1.5: Add input validation and error handling
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.1.6: Write unit tests for ProjectService
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.1.7: Write integration tests for API endpoints
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** None (foundational)
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.1.2: Create Epic/Story/Task Hierarchy
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** create epics, stories, and tasks in a hierarchy
|
|
**So that** I can break down large features into manageable work items
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can create Epic with title, description, project association
|
|
- ✅ Can create Story under an Epic
|
|
- ✅ Can create Task under a Story
|
|
- ✅ Can create Sub-task under a Task
|
|
- ✅ Hierarchy is enforced (e.g., can't create Task directly under Epic)
|
|
- ✅ Each level has appropriate attributes (priority, status, assignee, etc.)
|
|
- ✅ Can move items between parent containers (with validation)
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.1: Design issues table schema with polymorphic type field
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.2: Create IssueService with hierarchy validation logic
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.3: Implement parent-child relationship constraints
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.4: Build API endpoints for issue CRUD operations
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.5: Add hierarchy depth validation (max 4 levels)
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.6: Implement move/reorder functionality
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.7: Write comprehensive tests for hierarchy rules
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.2.8: Add database indexes for performance
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.1.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 8 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.1.3: Custom Fields Support
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** add custom fields to issues
|
|
**So that** I can capture project-specific information
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can define custom fields at project level
|
|
- ✅ Supported field types: text, number, date, select, multi-select, user
|
|
- ✅ Can set field as required or optional
|
|
- ✅ Can provide default values
|
|
- ✅ Custom field values are validated based on type
|
|
- ✅ Can search/filter issues by custom field values
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.3.1: Design custom_fields schema (JSONB column)
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.3.2: Create CustomFieldService for field definition management
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.3.3: Implement field validation logic per type
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.3.4: Build API endpoints for custom field CRUD
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.3.5: Add custom field values to issue API responses
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.3.6: Implement search/filter by custom fields
|
|
- [ ] T1.1.3.7: Write tests for all field types and validations
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.1.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 1.2: Workflow & Status Management
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Implement customizable workflows and status transitions for issues.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Enables teams to define their own processes and track work progress.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.2.1: Default Workflow Implementation
|
|
|
|
**As a** team member
|
|
**I want to** move issues through workflow states
|
|
**So that** I can track work progress
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Default statuses: To Do, In Progress, Review, Done
|
|
- ✅ Can transition issues between allowed states
|
|
- ✅ Status history is tracked with timestamps
|
|
- ✅ Cannot skip required workflow steps
|
|
- ✅ Can view issue status history
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.1.1: Design workflow schema (statuses, transitions)
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.1.2: Create WorkflowService with transition validation
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.1.3: Implement status change API endpoint
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.1.4: Add status history tracking to audit log
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.1.5: Build status transition validation rules
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.1.6: Write tests for all workflow scenarios
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.1.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.2.2: Custom Workflow Configuration
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** configure custom workflows per project
|
|
**So that** I can match our team's process
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can add/remove statuses for a project
|
|
- ✅ Can define allowed transitions between statuses
|
|
- ✅ Can set status categories (To Do, In Progress, Done)
|
|
- ✅ Can assign colors to statuses
|
|
- ✅ Changes don't break existing issues
|
|
- ✅ Can preview workflow as a diagram
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.2.1: Design workflow configuration schema
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.2.2: Create WorkflowConfigService
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.2.3: Implement workflow builder API
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.2.4: Add validation for workflow integrity
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.2.5: Handle migration of existing issues to new workflow
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.2.6: Create workflow visualization data format
|
|
- [ ] T1.2.2.7: Write tests for workflow configuration changes
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.2.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 1.3: Kanban Board View
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Build interactive Kanban board for visualizing and managing work.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Primary interface for agile teams to manage daily work.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.3.1: Basic Kanban Board Display
|
|
|
|
**As a** team member
|
|
**I want to** view issues on a Kanban board
|
|
**So that** I can see work status at a glance
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Board displays columns for each workflow status
|
|
- ✅ Issues are shown as cards in appropriate columns
|
|
- ✅ Cards show: title, key, assignee avatar, priority, labels
|
|
- ✅ Can filter board by assignee, label, epic
|
|
- ✅ Can search issues on board
|
|
- ✅ Board loads within 2 seconds for projects with 500+ issues
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.1: Design React component structure for board
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.2: Implement board data fetching with pagination
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.3: Build column component with issue list
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.4: Create issue card component
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.5: Implement filtering and search UI
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.6: Add loading states and error handling
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.7: Optimize rendering performance
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.1.8: Write component tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.2.1, Backend API
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.3.2: Drag-and-Drop Functionality
|
|
|
|
**As a** team member
|
|
**I want to** drag issues between columns
|
|
**So that** I can quickly update status
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can drag issue cards between columns
|
|
- ✅ Status updates immediately on drop
|
|
- ✅ Invalid transitions are prevented with visual feedback
|
|
- ✅ Drag preview shows card snapshot
|
|
- ✅ Works on touch devices (tablets)
|
|
- ✅ Optimistic UI updates with rollback on error
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.1: Integrate react-beautiful-dnd library
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.2: Implement drag handlers and drop zones
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.3: Add transition validation before API call
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.4: Implement optimistic updates
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.5: Add error handling and rollback
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.6: Style drag preview and drop indicators
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.7: Test on mobile/tablet devices
|
|
- [ ] T1.3.2.8: Write interaction tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.3.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 1.4: Audit Log & Version History
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Track all changes to issues and enable rollback capability.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Accountability, debugging, compliance, and data recovery.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 1.5 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.4.1: Comprehensive Change Tracking
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** see complete history of all changes
|
|
**So that** I can understand what happened and when
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ All entity changes are logged (create, update, delete)
|
|
- ✅ Log includes: timestamp, user, action type, before/after values
|
|
- ✅ Field-level change tracking (not just full entity snapshots)
|
|
- ✅ Can view change history for any issue
|
|
- ✅ Can filter history by user, date range, field
|
|
- ✅ System changes (automation) are distinguished from user changes
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.1: Design audit_log table schema
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.2: Create AuditService with logging methods
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.3: Implement database triggers or service layer logging
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.4: Store before/after diffs efficiently (JSONB)
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.5: Build audit log query API with filters
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.6: Add audit log to issue detail API response
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.7: Implement log retention policies
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.1.8: Write tests for audit capture
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.1.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 1.4.2: Rollback Capability
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** revert issues to previous state
|
|
**So that** I can undo mistakes or unwanted changes
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can preview issue state at any point in history
|
|
- ✅ Can rollback to previous state with one click
|
|
- ✅ Rollback operation itself is logged
|
|
- ✅ Cannot rollback if it would create conflicts
|
|
- ✅ User receives confirmation before rollback
|
|
- ✅ Rollback includes all fields changed since target version
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.1: Design rollback transaction mechanism
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.2: Create RollbackService with conflict detection
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.3: Implement rollback API endpoint
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.4: Add validation for rollback eligibility
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.5: Build rollback UI with preview
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.6: Log rollback operations in audit trail
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.7: Write tests for rollback scenarios
|
|
- [ ] T1.4.2.8: Document rollback limitations
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 1.4.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### M1 Summary
|
|
|
|
**Total Epics:** 4
|
|
**Total Stories:** 10
|
|
**Total Tasks:** 62
|
|
**Estimated Duration:** 8 weeks (2 months)
|
|
**Team Size:** 2 Backend, 1 Frontend, 1 QA
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## M2: MCP Server Implementation (Months 3-4)
|
|
|
|
### Epic 2.1: MCP Protocol Foundation
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Implement MCP server infrastructure and basic connectivity.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Enables AI tools to connect to ColaFlow.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.1.1: MCP Server Setup & Configuration
|
|
|
|
**As a** developer
|
|
**I want to** set up MCP server infrastructure
|
|
**So that** AI tools can connect via MCP protocol
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ MCP server runs as separate service/module
|
|
- ✅ Supports MCP protocol specification v1.0+
|
|
- ✅ Handles client connections and handshake
|
|
- ✅ Configuration via environment variables
|
|
- ✅ Health check endpoint for monitoring
|
|
- ✅ Proper error handling and logging
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.1: Install MCP SDK dependencies
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.2: Create MCPServerModule in NestJS
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.3: Implement connection handler
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.4: Add configuration service for MCP settings
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.5: Implement health check and status endpoints
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.6: Add comprehensive logging
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.7: Write connection tests
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.1.8: Document MCP server setup
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M1 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.1.2: Authentication & Authorization for MCP
|
|
|
|
**As a** system administrator
|
|
**I want to** secure MCP connections
|
|
**So that** only authorized AI agents can access data
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ MCP clients must authenticate with API token
|
|
- ✅ Tokens can be generated and revoked via admin UI
|
|
- ✅ Each token has configurable permissions (read/write)
|
|
- ✅ Token usage is logged for audit
|
|
- ✅ Rate limiting per token
|
|
- ✅ Expired tokens are rejected
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.1: Design API token schema and storage
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.2: Create TokenService for token management
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.3: Implement MCP authentication middleware
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.4: Build token CRUD API endpoints
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.5: Add rate limiting with Redis
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.6: Implement token expiration checking
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.7: Build admin UI for token management
|
|
- [ ] T2.1.2.8: Write security tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.1.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 2.2: MCP Resources Implementation
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Expose project data as MCP resources for AI to read.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** AI tools can query ColaFlow data.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.2.1: Implement projects.search Resource
|
|
|
|
**As an** AI agent
|
|
**I want to** search for projects
|
|
**So that** I can find relevant project information
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Resource URI: `colaflow://projects.search`
|
|
- ✅ Supports filters: name, key, status, owner
|
|
- ✅ Returns project summary with metadata
|
|
- ✅ Paginated results (max 50 per page)
|
|
- ✅ Respects user permissions
|
|
- ✅ Response follows MCP resource format
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.1.1: Define MCP resource schema for projects
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.1.2: Implement ResourceProvider for projects
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.1.3: Add search and filter logic
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.1.4: Implement pagination
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.1.5: Add permission checks
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.1.6: Write resource tests
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.1.7: Document resource in MCP catalog
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.1.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.2.2: Implement issues.search Resource
|
|
|
|
**As an** AI agent
|
|
**I want to** search for issues
|
|
**So that** I can analyze tasks and provide insights
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Resource URI: `colaflow://issues.search`
|
|
- ✅ Supports filters: project, status, assignee, label, epic
|
|
- ✅ Supports JQL-like query syntax
|
|
- ✅ Returns issue details with all fields
|
|
- ✅ Includes related entities (parent, children)
|
|
- ✅ Paginated with cursor-based pagination
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.1: Define MCP resource schema for issues
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.2: Implement ResourceProvider for issues
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.3: Build query parser for search syntax
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.4: Add complex filtering logic
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.5: Implement cursor-based pagination
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.6: Add related entity resolution
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.7: Write comprehensive query tests
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.2.8: Document query syntax
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.2.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.2.3: Implement Additional Resources
|
|
|
|
**As an** AI agent
|
|
**I want to** access various project artifacts
|
|
**So that** I can provide comprehensive assistance
|
|
|
|
**Resources to Implement:**
|
|
- `docs.create_draft` - Document templates and drafts
|
|
- `reports.daily` - Daily progress summaries
|
|
- `sprints.current` - Current sprint information
|
|
- `backlogs.view` - Product backlog access
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Each resource has documented schema
|
|
- ✅ Proper error handling for not found
|
|
- ✅ Performance optimized (< 200ms response)
|
|
- ✅ Permission-based access control
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.3.1: Implement docs.create_draft resource
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.3.2: Implement reports.daily resource
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.3.3: Implement sprints.current resource
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.3.4: Implement backlogs.view resource
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.3.5: Add caching for frequently accessed resources
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.3.6: Write tests for all resources
|
|
- [ ] T2.2.3.7: Document all resources
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.2.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 2.3: MCP Tools Implementation
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Expose write operations as MCP tools with diff preview.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** AI can propose changes that humans review.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.3.1: Implement Diff Preview System
|
|
|
|
**As a** user
|
|
**I want to** preview AI-proposed changes before they're applied
|
|
**So that** I can maintain control over my data
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ AI tool calls generate diff preview instead of direct writes
|
|
- ✅ Diff shows current vs. proposed state side-by-side
|
|
- ✅ Diffs are stored temporarily with unique ID
|
|
- ✅ Diffs expire after configurable timeout (default 24h)
|
|
- ✅ Can retrieve diff for review
|
|
- ✅ Can approve or reject diff
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.1: Design diff storage schema (Redis + PostgreSQL)
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.2: Create DiffService for diff generation
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.3: Implement diff generation algorithms
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.4: Build diff storage with expiration
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.5: Create approval/rejection API endpoints
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.6: Implement diff application logic
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.7: Add notification for new diffs
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.1.8: Write diff generation tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.2.3
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.3.2: Implement create_issue Tool
|
|
|
|
**As an** AI agent
|
|
**I want to** propose creating new issues
|
|
**So that** I can help with task breakdown
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Tool accepts: project, type, title, description, parent, assignee
|
|
- ✅ Validates all required fields
|
|
- ✅ Generates diff preview showing new issue
|
|
- ✅ Returns diff ID for human review
|
|
- ✅ Approved diff creates actual issue
|
|
- ✅ Creation is logged in audit trail
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.1: Define MCP tool schema for create_issue
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.2: Implement ToolProvider for create_issue
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.3: Add input validation logic
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.4: Integrate with DiffService
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.5: Implement issue creation on approval
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.6: Add audit logging
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.7: Write tool tests
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.2.8: Document tool usage
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.3.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.3.3: Implement update_status Tool
|
|
|
|
**As an** AI agent
|
|
**I want to** propose status changes
|
|
**So that** I can help keep tasks up to date
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Tool accepts: issue_id, new_status, comment
|
|
- ✅ Validates status transition is allowed
|
|
- ✅ Generates diff preview showing status change
|
|
- ✅ Includes comment in diff if provided
|
|
- ✅ Approved diff updates issue status
|
|
- ✅ Triggers workflow automation on status change
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.1: Define MCP tool schema for update_status
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.2: Implement ToolProvider for update_status
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.3: Add workflow transition validation
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.4: Integrate with DiffService
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.5: Implement status update on approval
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.6: Trigger workflow hooks
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.7: Write tool tests
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.3.8: Document tool usage
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.3.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.3.4: Implement Additional Tools
|
|
|
|
**As an** AI agent
|
|
**I want to** perform various operations
|
|
**So that** I can assist with project management
|
|
|
|
**Tools to Implement:**
|
|
- `assign_task` - Assign issues to users
|
|
- `log_decision` - Record key decisions
|
|
- `generate_report` - Create progress reports
|
|
- `estimate_task` - Add time estimates
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Each tool has clear input schema
|
|
- ✅ All tools use diff preview mechanism
|
|
- ✅ Proper error messages for invalid inputs
|
|
- ✅ Tools are discoverable via MCP protocol
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.4.1: Implement assign_task tool
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.4.2: Implement log_decision tool
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.4.3: Implement generate_report tool
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.4.4: Implement estimate_task tool
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.4.5: Add tool discovery metadata
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.4.6: Write tests for all tools
|
|
- [ ] T2.3.4.7: Document all tools
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.3.3
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 2.4: AI Control Console UI
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Build user interface for reviewing and approving AI changes.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Human oversight of AI operations.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.4.1: Diff Review Interface
|
|
|
|
**As a** user
|
|
**I want to** review AI-proposed changes in a clear interface
|
|
**So that** I can quickly approve or reject them
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ List view shows all pending diffs
|
|
- ✅ Each diff shows: AI agent, timestamp, operation type, status
|
|
- ✅ Detail view shows side-by-side comparison
|
|
- ✅ Highlighting for added/removed/changed fields
|
|
- ✅ Can approve or reject with optional comment
|
|
- ✅ Batch approve/reject multiple diffs
|
|
- ✅ Real-time updates when new diffs arrive
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.1: Design AI console page layout
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.2: Build diff list component
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.3: Create diff detail component with comparison view
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.4: Implement syntax highlighting for diffs
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.5: Add approve/reject buttons with confirmation
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.6: Implement batch operations UI
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.7: Add WebSocket for real-time updates
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.1.8: Write component tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.3.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 2.4.2: AI Activity Dashboard
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** monitor AI agent activity and statistics
|
|
**So that** I can understand AI usage patterns
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Dashboard shows: total operations, approval rate, rejection rate
|
|
- ✅ Charts for operations over time
|
|
- ✅ Breakdown by operation type
|
|
- ✅ List of most active AI agents
|
|
- ✅ Average review time metrics
|
|
- ✅ Can filter by date range and agent
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.2.1: Design dashboard layout
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.2.2: Create analytics API endpoints
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.2.3: Build metrics calculation service
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.2.4: Implement chart components
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.2.5: Add filtering and date range selectors
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.2.6: Cache dashboard data for performance
|
|
- [ ] T2.4.2.7: Write dashboard tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 2.4.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### M2 Summary
|
|
|
|
**Total Epics:** 4
|
|
**Total Stories:** 11
|
|
**Total Tasks:** 72
|
|
**Estimated Duration:** 8 weeks (2 months)
|
|
**Team Size:** 2 Backend, 1 Frontend, 1 AI Engineer, 1 QA
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## M3: ChatGPT Integration PoC (Months 5-6)
|
|
|
|
### Epic 3.1: AI Task Generation
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Enable AI to break down high-level descriptions into structured tasks.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Dramatically reduce time spent on task breakdown.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 3.1.1: Natural Language Task Creation
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** describe a feature in natural language
|
|
**So that** AI can generate a structured task breakdown
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can input free-form text description
|
|
- ✅ AI analyzes and proposes Epic/Story/Task hierarchy
|
|
- ✅ Each generated task has: title, description, acceptance criteria
|
|
- ✅ Can preview full structure before creation
|
|
- ✅ Can edit individual tasks in preview
|
|
- ✅ Approval creates all tasks with proper hierarchy
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.1: Design task generation prompt template
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.2: Create TaskGenerationService
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.3: Implement OpenAI API integration
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.4: Parse AI response into structured format
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.5: Build task generation UI component
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.6: Add preview and edit functionality
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.7: Integrate with diff preview system
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.1.8: Write generation tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M2 Epic 2.3 (MCP Tools)
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 3.1.2: Automatic Acceptance Criteria Generation
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** AI to suggest acceptance criteria for tasks
|
|
**So that** I can ensure all tasks have clear definitions of done
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ AI detects tasks without acceptance criteria
|
|
- ✅ Proposes 3-5 relevant acceptance criteria per task
|
|
- ✅ Criteria are specific, measurable, and testable
|
|
- ✅ Can accept all, accept some, or reject suggestions
|
|
- ✅ Can edit suggestions before accepting
|
|
- ✅ Learns from accepted/rejected suggestions over time
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.1: Design AC generation prompt template
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.2: Create ACGenerationService
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.3: Implement detection of missing ACs
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.4: Build batch AC generation for multiple tasks
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.5: Create AC suggestion UI
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.6: Implement feedback collection
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.7: Add learning mechanism (fine-tuning or RAG)
|
|
- [ ] T3.1.2.8: Write AC generation tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 3.1.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 3.2: Automated Reporting
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Generate daily standups, weekly reports, and risk assessments.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Save time on status reporting and improve visibility.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 3.2.1: Daily Standup Report Generation
|
|
|
|
**As a** team lead
|
|
**I want to** automatically generate daily standup summaries
|
|
**So that** I can quickly share progress with the team
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Report includes: completed tasks, in-progress tasks, blockers
|
|
- ✅ Grouped by team member
|
|
- ✅ Includes key metrics: velocity, completion rate
|
|
- ✅ Can schedule automatic generation and delivery
|
|
- ✅ Can customize report format and content
|
|
- ✅ Can export to Slack, email, or PDF
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.1: Design daily report data aggregation query
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.2: Create ReportGenerationService
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.3: Implement daily report template
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.4: Build report scheduling system
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.5: Add Slack integration
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.6: Add email delivery
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.7: Build report UI and customization
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.1.8: Write report generation tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M2 Epic 2.2 (MCP Resources)
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 3.2.2: AI-Generated Risk Reports
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** AI to identify project risks
|
|
**So that** I can proactively address issues
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ AI analyzes: overdue tasks, blocked items, resource bottlenecks
|
|
- ✅ Generates risk report with severity levels
|
|
- ✅ Includes suggested mitigation actions
|
|
- ✅ Can trigger alerts for high-severity risks
|
|
- ✅ Historical risk tracking over time
|
|
- ✅ Can customize risk detection rules
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.1: Define risk detection algorithms
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.2: Create RiskAnalysisService
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.3: Implement AI-powered risk assessment
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.4: Build risk report template
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.5: Add alerting system
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.6: Create risk dashboard UI
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.7: Implement risk tracking over time
|
|
- [ ] T3.2.2.8: Write risk analysis tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 3.2.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 3.3: ChatGPT Custom GPT Integration
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Create ColaFlow GPT with MCP connection.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Seamless ChatGPT → ColaFlow workflow.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 3.3.1: ColaFlow GPT Configuration
|
|
|
|
**As a** user
|
|
**I want to** interact with ColaFlow via ChatGPT
|
|
**So that** I can manage projects conversationally
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Custom GPT is configured with ColaFlow MCP connection
|
|
- ✅ GPT can read project data via MCP resources
|
|
- ✅ GPT can propose changes via MCP tools
|
|
- ✅ All operations go through human approval flow
|
|
- ✅ GPT provides helpful prompts and guidance
|
|
- ✅ Documentation for GPT setup and usage
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.1: Create Custom GPT in OpenAI platform
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.2: Configure MCP connection settings
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.3: Write GPT system instructions
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.4: Test all MCP resources from GPT
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.5: Test all MCP tools from GPT
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.6: Create user documentation
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.7: Create video tutorial
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.1.8: Conduct user testing
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M2 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 3.3.2: Conversational Project Management
|
|
|
|
**As a** user
|
|
**I want to** perform common project tasks via chat
|
|
**So that** I can work more naturally
|
|
|
|
**Example Commands:**
|
|
- "Create a new project called ColaFlow v2"
|
|
- "Show me all high-priority bugs"
|
|
- "Generate a weekly progress report"
|
|
- "What tasks are blocked?"
|
|
- "Assign COLA-123 to Alice"
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ GPT correctly interprets natural language commands
|
|
- ✅ Provides clear confirmation and feedback
|
|
- ✅ Handles ambiguity by asking clarifying questions
|
|
- ✅ Suggests relevant actions based on context
|
|
- ✅ Maintains conversation context
|
|
- ✅ Respects user permissions
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.1: Design conversation flows for common tasks
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.2: Create prompt templates for each flow
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.3: Implement context management
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.4: Add clarification question logic
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.5: Test conversation quality
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.6: Create example conversation library
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.7: Document conversation capabilities
|
|
- [ ] T3.3.2.8: Conduct user acceptance testing
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 3.3.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### M3 Summary
|
|
|
|
**Total Epics:** 3
|
|
**Total Stories:** 7
|
|
**Total Tasks:** 47
|
|
**Estimated Duration:** 8 weeks (2 months)
|
|
**Team Size:** 1 Backend, 1 Frontend, 1 AI Engineer, 1 QA
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## M4: External System Integration (Months 7-8)
|
|
|
|
### Epic 4.1: GitHub Integration
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Bi-directional sync between GitHub and ColaFlow.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Unified development workflow.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 4.1.1: GitHub OAuth & Repository Connection
|
|
|
|
**As a** developer
|
|
**I want to** connect my GitHub repositories to ColaFlow
|
|
**So that** PRs and commits can sync with tasks
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can authenticate via GitHub OAuth
|
|
- ✅ Can select repositories to connect
|
|
- ✅ Can map repositories to projects
|
|
- ✅ Connection status is visible
|
|
- ✅ Can disconnect repositories
|
|
- ✅ Supports GitHub Enterprise
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.1.1: Implement GitHub OAuth flow
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.1.2: Create GitHub integration service
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.1.3: Build repository selection UI
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.1.4: Store connection configuration
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.1.5: Add connection health monitoring
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.1.6: Implement disconnect logic
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.1.7: Write integration tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M3 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 4.1.2: PR → Task Linking
|
|
|
|
**As a** developer
|
|
**I want to** link PRs to tasks automatically
|
|
**So that** code changes are tracked with tasks
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ PR references (e.g., COLA-123) auto-link to tasks
|
|
- ✅ PR status shown on task detail page
|
|
- ✅ PR merge auto-updates task status (configurable)
|
|
- ✅ Multiple PRs can link to one task
|
|
- ✅ PR comments sync to task activity
|
|
- ✅ Can manually link/unlink PRs
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.1: Implement GitHub webhook handler
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.2: Parse PR descriptions for task references
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.3: Create PR-task linking logic
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.4: Add PR status to task API
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.5: Implement auto-status update rules
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.6: Build PR display in task UI
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.7: Add manual linking controls
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.2.8: Write webhook tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 4.1.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 4.1.3: Branch & Commit Tracking
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** see development activity on tasks
|
|
**So that** I can track code progress
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Task detail shows linked branches
|
|
- ✅ Task detail shows related commits
|
|
- ✅ Commit messages with task keys auto-link
|
|
- ✅ Can view commit diffs inline
|
|
- ✅ Shows commit author and timestamp
|
|
- ✅ Aggregates commit count per task
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.1: Implement commit webhook handler
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.2: Parse commit messages for task references
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.3: Store commit metadata
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.4: Build commit timeline UI
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.5: Add branch display
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.6: Implement diff viewer
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.7: Add commit statistics
|
|
- [ ] T4.1.3.8: Write commit tracking tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 4.1.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 4.2: Slack Integration
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Notifications, commands, and summaries via Slack.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Team communication hub integration.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 4.2.1: Slack App & Bot Setup
|
|
|
|
**As a** team
|
|
**I want to** connect ColaFlow to Slack workspace
|
|
**So that** we receive notifications and updates
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can install ColaFlow Slack app
|
|
- ✅ OAuth authentication flow works
|
|
- ✅ Bot joins designated channels
|
|
- ✅ Can configure notification preferences
|
|
- ✅ Can uninstall app cleanly
|
|
- ✅ Supports Slack Enterprise Grid
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.1.1: Create Slack app in Slack API console
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.1.2: Implement Slack OAuth flow
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.1.3: Create SlackService for API calls
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.1.4: Build app installation UI
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.1.5: Implement bot join/leave logic
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.1.6: Add configuration settings
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.1.7: Write Slack integration tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M3 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 4.2.2: Task Notifications in Slack
|
|
|
|
**As a** team member
|
|
**I want to** receive task updates in Slack
|
|
**So that** I stay informed without checking ColaFlow constantly
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Notifications for: task assigned, status changed, mentioned
|
|
- ✅ Can configure notification types per channel
|
|
- ✅ Rich formatting with task details
|
|
- ✅ Includes link to task in ColaFlow
|
|
- ✅ Can snooze or dismiss notifications
|
|
- ✅ Respects user's notification preferences
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.2.1: Design notification event system
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.2.2: Create NotificationService
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.2.3: Implement Slack message formatting
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.2.4: Build notification preferences UI
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.2.5: Add notification triggers to task operations
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.2.6: Implement rate limiting for notifications
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.2.7: Write notification tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 4.2.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 4.2.3: Slash Commands in Slack
|
|
|
|
**As a** user
|
|
**I want to** perform quick actions via Slack commands
|
|
**So that** I can update tasks without leaving Slack
|
|
|
|
**Example Commands:**
|
|
- `/colaflow task COLA-123` - View task details
|
|
- `/colaflow assign COLA-123 @alice` - Assign task
|
|
- `/colaflow status COLA-123 done` - Update status
|
|
- `/colaflow create "Fix login bug"` - Quick task creation
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Slash commands are registered in Slack
|
|
- ✅ Commands provide inline feedback
|
|
- ✅ Error messages are clear and helpful
|
|
- ✅ Supports autocomplete where applicable
|
|
- ✅ Respects user permissions
|
|
- ✅ Usage is logged for audit
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.3.1: Register slash commands in Slack app
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.3.2: Implement command parser
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.3.3: Create command handler for each action
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.3.4: Build response formatting
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.3.5: Add permission checking
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.3.6: Implement autocomplete
|
|
- [ ] T4.2.3.7: Write command tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 4.2.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 4.3: Calendar Integration
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Sync sprints, milestones, and deadlines with calendars.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Unified scheduling and timeline visibility.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 1 week
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 4.3.1: Google Calendar Integration
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** sync ColaFlow events to Google Calendar
|
|
**So that** deadlines and sprints appear in my calendar
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can authenticate with Google Calendar
|
|
- ✅ Sprint start/end dates sync to calendar
|
|
- ✅ Milestone dates create calendar events
|
|
- ✅ Task due dates can optionally sync
|
|
- ✅ Two-way sync: changes in either system reflect
|
|
- ✅ Can configure which events to sync
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T4.3.1.1: Implement Google Calendar OAuth
|
|
- [ ] T4.3.1.2: Create CalendarService
|
|
- [ ] T4.3.1.3: Implement event sync logic
|
|
- [ ] T4.3.1.4: Handle two-way sync conflicts
|
|
- [ ] T4.3.1.5: Build sync configuration UI
|
|
- [ ] T4.3.1.6: Add sync status monitoring
|
|
- [ ] T4.3.1.7: Write calendar integration tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M3 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### M4 Summary
|
|
|
|
**Total Epics:** 3
|
|
**Total Stories:** 7
|
|
**Total Tasks:** 46
|
|
**Estimated Duration:** 8 weeks (2 months)
|
|
**Team Size:** 2 Backend, 1 Frontend, 1 QA
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## M5: Enterprise Pilot (Month 9)
|
|
|
|
### Epic 5.1: Enterprise Features
|
|
|
|
**Description:** SSO, LDAP, advanced permissions, compliance.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Enterprise readiness for pilot deployment.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.1.1: Single Sign-On (SSO) Support
|
|
|
|
**As an** enterprise admin
|
|
**I want to** configure SSO authentication
|
|
**So that** users can log in with corporate credentials
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Supports SAML 2.0
|
|
- ✅ Supports OIDC (OpenID Connect)
|
|
- ✅ Can configure multiple identity providers
|
|
- ✅ User provisioning on first login
|
|
- ✅ Role mapping from SSO attributes
|
|
- ✅ Comprehensive SSO admin documentation
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.1.1: Implement SAML authentication flow
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.1.2: Implement OIDC authentication flow
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.1.3: Build IdP configuration UI
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.1.4: Add user auto-provisioning
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.1.5: Implement role mapping
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.1.6: Write SSO documentation
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.1.7: Test with common IdPs (Okta, Azure AD, etc.)
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M4 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.1.2: Advanced Permission System
|
|
|
|
**As an** admin
|
|
**I want to** configure granular permissions
|
|
**So that** I can control access at field level
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Can define custom roles beyond default set
|
|
- ✅ Field-level read/write permissions
|
|
- ✅ Project-level permission overrides
|
|
- ✅ Permission inheritance and cascading
|
|
- ✅ Permission testing/preview tool
|
|
- ✅ Audit log for permission changes
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.2.1: Design advanced permission schema
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.2.2: Implement permission evaluation engine
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.2.3: Build role management UI
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.2.4: Add field-level permission controls
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.2.5: Implement permission preview
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.2.6: Add permission audit logging
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.2.7: Write permission tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 5.1.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.1.3: Compliance & Data Privacy
|
|
|
|
**As a** compliance officer
|
|
**I want to** ensure ColaFlow meets regulatory requirements
|
|
**So that** we can deploy in regulated industries
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ GDPR compliance: data export, right to deletion
|
|
- ✅ Data retention policies configurable
|
|
- ✅ PII field identification and protection
|
|
- ✅ Audit log retention and immutability
|
|
- ✅ Compliance report generation
|
|
- ✅ Data encryption at rest and in transit
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.1: Implement GDPR data export
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.2: Implement right to deletion
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.3: Add data retention policies
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.4: Identify and protect PII fields
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.5: Ensure audit log immutability
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.6: Build compliance reports
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.7: Verify encryption implementation
|
|
- [ ] T5.1.3.8: Conduct security audit
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 5.1.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 5.2: Performance & Scalability
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Optimize for large datasets and high concurrency.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Support enterprise-scale deployments.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.2.1: Database Optimization
|
|
|
|
**As a** system admin
|
|
**I want to** ensure system performs well with large datasets
|
|
**So that** users have fast experience
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ All critical queries < 100ms (p95)
|
|
- ✅ Proper indexing on all foreign keys
|
|
- ✅ Query optimization for complex searches
|
|
- ✅ Connection pooling configured
|
|
- ✅ Database monitoring and alerting
|
|
- ✅ Handles 10,000+ issues per project
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.1.1: Analyze slow query log
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.1.2: Add missing database indexes
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.1.3: Optimize complex queries
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.1.4: Configure connection pooling
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.1.5: Set up database monitoring
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.1.6: Run load tests
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.1.7: Document optimization findings
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M4 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.2.2: Caching Strategy
|
|
|
|
**As a** developer
|
|
**I want to** implement effective caching
|
|
**So that** frequently accessed data loads instantly
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Redis cache for session data
|
|
- ✅ API response caching for read-heavy endpoints
|
|
- ✅ Cache invalidation on data changes
|
|
- ✅ Cache hit rate > 80% for common queries
|
|
- ✅ Cache monitoring and metrics
|
|
- ✅ Configurable cache TTL per resource type
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.2.1: Set up Redis cluster
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.2.2: Implement cache middleware
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.2.3: Add caching to hot endpoints
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.2.4: Implement cache invalidation logic
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.2.5: Add cache metrics
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.2.6: Configure cache TTL per resource
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.2.7: Test cache behavior under load
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 5.2.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.2.3: Horizontal Scaling
|
|
|
|
**As a** DevOps engineer
|
|
**I want to** deploy ColaFlow in clustered mode
|
|
**So that** we can handle high traffic
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Stateless application servers
|
|
- ✅ Load balancer configuration documented
|
|
- ✅ Session management via Redis
|
|
- ✅ Database read replicas supported
|
|
- ✅ Health checks for all services
|
|
- ✅ Kubernetes deployment manifests
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.1: Ensure stateless application design
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.2: Implement Redis-based session storage
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.3: Configure database read replicas
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.4: Create Kubernetes manifests
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.5: Set up load balancer
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.6: Add health check endpoints
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.7: Test failover scenarios
|
|
- [ ] T5.2.3.8: Document deployment architecture
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 5.2.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 5.3: Internal Pilot Deployment
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Deploy to internal teams and gather feedback.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Validate product with real users before external release.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 2 weeks (includes monitoring period)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.3.1: Pilot Environment Setup
|
|
|
|
**As a** DevOps engineer
|
|
**I want to** deploy ColaFlow to production-like environment
|
|
**So that** pilot users can test with real data
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Production-like infrastructure (cloud-based)
|
|
- ✅ SSL certificates configured
|
|
- ✅ Monitoring and logging in place
|
|
- ✅ Backup and disaster recovery configured
|
|
- ✅ Performance meets SLA targets
|
|
- ✅ Security hardening applied
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.1: Provision cloud infrastructure
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.2: Deploy application with CI/CD pipeline
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.3: Configure SSL/TLS certificates
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.4: Set up monitoring (Prometheus, Grafana)
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.5: Configure logging (ELK stack)
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.6: Implement backup strategy
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.7: Conduct security hardening
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.1.8: Run smoke tests
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Epic 5.2 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 5 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.3.2: User Onboarding & Training
|
|
|
|
**As a** pilot user
|
|
**I want to** understand how to use ColaFlow
|
|
**So that** I can be productive quickly
|
|
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- User documentation
|
|
- Video tutorials
|
|
- Live training sessions
|
|
- FAQ and troubleshooting guide
|
|
- Feedback collection mechanism
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ All pilot users complete onboarding training
|
|
- ✅ Documentation covers all main features
|
|
- ✅ Users can create projects and tasks independently
|
|
- ✅ Support channel is available for questions
|
|
- ✅ Feedback mechanism is in place
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.2.1: Create user documentation
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.2.2: Record video tutorials
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.2.3: Prepare training presentation
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.2.4: Conduct live training sessions
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.2.5: Set up support Slack channel
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.2.6: Create feedback survey
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.2.7: Schedule weekly check-ins
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 5.3.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 5.3.3: Feedback Collection & Iteration
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** gather and act on pilot user feedback
|
|
**So that** we can improve before wider release
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Weekly feedback surveys sent
|
|
- ✅ Bi-weekly check-in meetings held
|
|
- ✅ Bug reports tracked and prioritized
|
|
- ✅ Feature requests logged
|
|
- ✅ Critical issues resolved within 48 hours
|
|
- ✅ Feedback summary report created
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.1: Create feedback survey template
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.2: Set up bug tracking workflow
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.3: Conduct bi-weekly check-ins
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.4: Triage and prioritize issues
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.5: Fix critical bugs
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.6: Analyze feedback themes
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.7: Create feedback summary report
|
|
- [ ] T5.3.3.8: Plan M6 improvements based on feedback
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 5.3.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** Ongoing (2 weeks monitoring)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### M5 Summary
|
|
|
|
**Total Epics:** 3
|
|
**Total Stories:** 9
|
|
**Total Tasks:** 52
|
|
**Estimated Duration:** 4 weeks (1 month)
|
|
**Team Size:** 2 Backend, 1 Frontend, 1 DevOps, 1 QA, 1 PM
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## M6: Stable Release (Months 10-12)
|
|
|
|
### Epic 6.1: Documentation & Developer Experience
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Comprehensive documentation, API docs, SDK, and developer portal.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Enable community adoption and third-party integrations.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.1.1: API Documentation
|
|
|
|
**As a** developer
|
|
**I want to** comprehensive API documentation
|
|
**So that** I can integrate ColaFlow with other tools
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ All REST endpoints documented
|
|
- ✅ All GraphQL queries/mutations documented
|
|
- ✅ All MCP resources/tools documented
|
|
- ✅ Interactive API explorer (Swagger/GraphiQL)
|
|
- ✅ Code examples in multiple languages
|
|
- ✅ Authentication guide
|
|
- ✅ Rate limiting documentation
|
|
- ✅ Changelog for API versions
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.1: Set up Swagger/OpenAPI for REST
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.2: Generate API documentation from code
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.3: Add descriptions and examples to all endpoints
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.4: Document GraphQL schema
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.5: Document MCP protocol usage
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.6: Write authentication guide
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.7: Create code examples
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.1.8: Publish to developer portal
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M5 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.1.2: ColaFlow SDK
|
|
|
|
**As a** developer
|
|
**I want to** official SDKs for common languages
|
|
**So that** I can easily integrate ColaFlow
|
|
|
|
**Languages:**
|
|
- JavaScript/TypeScript
|
|
- Python
|
|
- Go (optional)
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ SDK covers all major API endpoints
|
|
- ✅ Proper error handling and typing
|
|
- ✅ Authentication helpers included
|
|
- ✅ Published to package registries (npm, PyPI)
|
|
- ✅ Comprehensive README and examples
|
|
- ✅ Unit tests with high coverage
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.1: Design SDK architecture
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.2: Implement TypeScript SDK
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.3: Implement Python SDK
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.4: Add authentication helpers
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.5: Write SDK documentation
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.6: Create example projects
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.7: Publish to npm and PyPI
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.2.8: Set up CI/CD for SDKs
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 6.1.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 8 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.1.3: Developer Portal & Community
|
|
|
|
**As a** developer
|
|
**I want to** central hub for ColaFlow development
|
|
**So that** I can find resources and connect with community
|
|
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- Developer portal website
|
|
- Getting started guides
|
|
- Tutorial series
|
|
- FAQ and troubleshooting
|
|
- Community forum or Discord
|
|
- GitHub repositories with examples
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Portal is live and accessible
|
|
- ✅ All documentation is searchable
|
|
- ✅ Community platform is active
|
|
- ✅ Getting started guide takes < 15 minutes
|
|
- ✅ Example projects cover common use cases
|
|
- ✅ Support channels are clearly defined
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.1: Build developer portal website
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.2: Write getting started guide
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.3: Create tutorial series
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.4: Set up community platform
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.5: Create example projects
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.6: Set up GitHub organization
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.7: Write contribution guidelines
|
|
- [ ] T6.1.3.8: Launch community outreach
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 6.1.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 6 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 6.2: Plugin Architecture & Extensibility
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Enable third-party extensions and customizations.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Ecosystem growth and long-term platform value.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 3 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.2.1: Plugin System Design
|
|
|
|
**As a** platform architect
|
|
**I want to** define plugin architecture
|
|
**So that** developers can extend ColaFlow safely
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Plugin manifest format defined
|
|
- ✅ Plugin lifecycle (install, enable, disable, uninstall)
|
|
- ✅ Sandboxed execution environment
|
|
- ✅ Plugin API access controls
|
|
- ✅ Version compatibility checking
|
|
- ✅ Plugin registry infrastructure
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.1: Design plugin architecture document
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.2: Define plugin manifest schema
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.3: Implement plugin loader
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.4: Create plugin sandbox environment
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.5: Build plugin registry backend
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.6: Implement version checking
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.7: Write plugin developer guide
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.1.8: Create example plugin
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** M5 completion
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 8 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.2.2: Plugin Marketplace
|
|
|
|
**As a** user
|
|
**I want to** discover and install plugins
|
|
**So that** I can extend ColaFlow functionality
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Marketplace UI for browsing plugins
|
|
- ✅ Plugin search and filtering
|
|
- ✅ Plugin ratings and reviews
|
|
- ✅ One-click plugin installation
|
|
- ✅ Plugin update notifications
|
|
- ✅ Security vetting process for listed plugins
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.1: Design marketplace UI
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.2: Build plugin listing API
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.3: Implement search and filtering
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.4: Add ratings and reviews system
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.5: Create plugin installation flow
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.6: Build update notification system
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.7: Define security review process
|
|
- [ ] T6.2.2.8: Publish official plugins
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Story 6.2.1
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 7 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Epic 6.3: Final Polish & Launch Preparation
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Bug fixes, performance tuning, marketing materials.
|
|
|
|
**Business Value:** Professional launch and user acquisition.
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 4 weeks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.3.1: Comprehensive Testing & Bug Fixes
|
|
|
|
**As a** QA engineer
|
|
**I want to** thoroughly test all features
|
|
**So that** we launch with high quality
|
|
|
|
**Testing Types:**
|
|
- Functional testing (all features)
|
|
- Integration testing (all external systems)
|
|
- Performance testing (load, stress)
|
|
- Security testing (penetration, vulnerability scan)
|
|
- Accessibility testing (WCAG compliance)
|
|
- Browser compatibility testing
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ All critical bugs resolved
|
|
- ✅ No P0 or P1 bugs in backlog
|
|
- ✅ Performance meets all SLA targets
|
|
- ✅ Security scan passes with no high-severity issues
|
|
- ✅ Accessibility audit passes
|
|
- ✅ All browsers supported work correctly
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.1: Conduct full functional testing
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.2: Run integration test suite
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.3: Perform load and stress testing
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.4: Conduct security audit
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.5: Run accessibility testing
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.6: Test browser compatibility
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.7: Fix all identified issues
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.1.8: Retest after fixes
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** All previous epics
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 10 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.3.2: Marketing & Launch Materials
|
|
|
|
**As a** marketing lead
|
|
**I want to** create launch materials
|
|
**So that** we can attract users
|
|
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- Product website
|
|
- Demo video
|
|
- Launch blog post
|
|
- Social media content
|
|
- Press kit
|
|
- Customer case studies
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Website is live and optimized for conversions
|
|
- ✅ Demo video clearly shows value proposition
|
|
- ✅ Launch blog post is published
|
|
- ✅ Social media accounts are active
|
|
- ✅ Press kit is ready for distribution
|
|
- ✅ At least 2 customer case studies available
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.1: Design and build product website
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.2: Create demo video
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.3: Write launch blog post
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.4: Create social media content
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.5: Prepare press kit
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.6: Write customer case studies
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.7: Set up analytics and tracking
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.2.8: Plan launch event/webinar
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** None (parallel work)
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** 8 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
#### Story 6.3.3: Launch & Post-Launch Support
|
|
|
|
**As a** PM
|
|
**I want to** execute successful launch
|
|
**So that** we gain initial user adoption
|
|
|
|
**Launch Checklist:**
|
|
- Production environment ready
|
|
- Monitoring and alerting active
|
|
- Support team trained
|
|
- Documentation complete
|
|
- Pricing and licensing finalized
|
|
- Legal terms and privacy policy published
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ All launch checklist items completed
|
|
- ✅ Launch announcement published
|
|
- ✅ Support channels are staffed
|
|
- ✅ Incident response plan is ready
|
|
- ✅ User onboarding flow works smoothly
|
|
- ✅ First week metrics are tracked
|
|
|
|
**Tasks:**
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.1: Complete launch checklist
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.2: Finalize pricing and licensing
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.3: Publish legal documents
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.4: Train support team
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.5: Execute launch announcement
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.6: Monitor launch metrics
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.7: Respond to user feedback
|
|
- [ ] T6.3.3.8: Create post-launch report
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:** Stories 6.3.1, 6.3.2
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:** Ongoing (launch week + 2 weeks)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### M6 Summary
|
|
|
|
**Total Epics:** 3
|
|
**Total Stories:** 8
|
|
**Total Tasks:** 57
|
|
**Estimated Duration:** 12 weeks (3 months)
|
|
**Team Size:** Full team (PM, Architect, 2 Backend, 1 Frontend, 1 AI Engineer, 1 QA, 1 DevOps, 1 Marketing)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Overall Project Summary
|
|
|
|
### Complete Feature Breakdown
|
|
|
|
| Milestone | Duration | Epics | Stories | Tasks | Team Size |
|
|
|-----------|----------|-------|---------|-------|-----------|
|
|
| M1 | 8 weeks | 4 | 10 | 62 | 4 |
|
|
| M2 | 8 weeks | 4 | 11 | 72 | 5 |
|
|
| M3 | 8 weeks | 3 | 7 | 47 | 4 |
|
|
| M4 | 8 weeks | 3 | 7 | 46 | 4 |
|
|
| M5 | 4 weeks | 3 | 9 | 52 | 6 |
|
|
| M6 | 12 weeks | 3 | 8 | 57 | 9 |
|
|
| **Total** | **48 weeks** | **20** | **52** | **336** | **Peak: 9** |
|
|
|
|
### Key Milestones Timeline
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
M1: Months 1-2 [████████]
|
|
M2: Months 3-4 [████████]
|
|
M3: Months 5-6 [████████]
|
|
M4: Months 7-8 [████████]
|
|
M5: Month 9 [████]
|
|
M6: Months 10-12 [████████████]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Critical Path
|
|
|
|
1. M1 → M2 → M3 → M4 → M5 → M6 (sequential dependencies)
|
|
2. Within each milestone, epics can have some parallelization
|
|
3. M6 has the most parallel work (documentation, testing, marketing)
|
|
|
|
### Resource Planning
|
|
|
|
**Core Team (Months 1-8):**
|
|
- 1 Product Manager (part-time)
|
|
- 1 Architect (full-time)
|
|
- 2 Backend Engineers (full-time)
|
|
- 1 Frontend Engineer (full-time)
|
|
- 1 AI Engineer (starting M2)
|
|
- 1 QA Engineer (full-time)
|
|
|
|
**Extended Team (Months 9-12):**
|
|
- Add 1 DevOps Engineer (M5)
|
|
- Add 1 Marketing Lead (M6)
|
|
- Increase PM to full-time (M6)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Appendix: Story Point Estimation
|
|
|
|
### Story Points by Epic
|
|
|
|
Each epic is assigned story points based on complexity, risk, and effort:
|
|
|
|
**M1 Epics:**
|
|
- Epic 1.1: 21 points
|
|
- Epic 1.2: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 1.3: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 1.4: 8 points
|
|
- **M1 Total: 55 points**
|
|
|
|
**M2 Epics:**
|
|
- Epic 2.1: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 2.2: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 2.3: 21 points
|
|
- Epic 2.4: 13 points
|
|
- **M2 Total: 60 points**
|
|
|
|
**M3 Epics:**
|
|
- Epic 3.1: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 3.2: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 3.3: 13 points
|
|
- **M3 Total: 39 points**
|
|
|
|
**M4 Epics:**
|
|
- Epic 4.1: 21 points
|
|
- Epic 4.2: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 4.3: 5 points
|
|
- **M4 Total: 39 points**
|
|
|
|
**M5 Epics:**
|
|
- Epic 5.1: 21 points
|
|
- Epic 5.2: 13 points
|
|
- Epic 5.3: 13 points
|
|
- **M5 Total: 47 points**
|
|
|
|
**M6 Epics:**
|
|
- Epic 6.1: 21 points
|
|
- Epic 6.2: 21 points
|
|
- Epic 6.3: 34 points
|
|
- **M6 Total: 76 points**
|
|
|
|
**Project Total: 316 story points**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Document Status:** Draft - Ready for sprint planning
|
|
|
|
**Next Steps:**
|
|
1. Review with development team for estimates validation
|
|
2. Create detailed sprint plans for M1
|
|
3. Set up project tracking in ColaFlow (dogfooding!)
|
|
4. Begin M1 Sprint 1 planning
|
|
|