kai/ColaFlow
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
d48b5cdd37c98bd08fa86acf099529a7dc7fafd4
ColaFlow/reports/2025-11-03-Day-6-Priority-Matrix.md
Yaojia Wang 32a25b3b35 In progress
2025-11-03 20:02:41 +01:00

286 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

# ColaFlow Day 6 Priority Matrix
**Date**: 2025-11-03
**Prepared By**: Product Manager Agent
**Purpose**: Visual comparison of Day 6 candidate features
---
## Priority Matrix: All Options Compared
| # | Feature | Time | Complexity | Business Value | MCP Readiness | Risk | Dependencies | Ready? | Recommendation |
|---|---------|------|------------|----------------|---------------|------|--------------|--------|----------------|
| **1** | **Role Management API** | **6-8h** | **MEDIUM** | **HIGH** | **MEDIUM** | **LOW** | **Day 5 RBAC ✅** | **✅ YES** | **✅ IMPLEMENT DAY 6** |
| 2 | Email Verification | 8-10h | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | LOW | MEDIUM | Email Service ❌ | ⏸️ NO | Defer to Day 7 |
| 3 | Password Reset | 6-8h | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | LOW | MEDIUM | Email Service ❌ | ⏸️ NO | Defer to Day 7 |
| 4 | Project-Level Roles | 10-12h | HIGH | HIGH | HIGH | HIGH | Projects Module ❌ | ⏸️ NO | Defer to Day 8 |
| 5 | User Invitations | 10-12h | HIGH | HIGH | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | Email + UI ❌ | ⏸️ NO | Defer to Day 8-9 |
---
## Detailed Scoring Matrix
### 1. Role Management API (WINNER ✅)
| Criteria | Score | Justification |
|----------|-------|---------------|
| **Business Value** | 9/10 | Completes tenant management loop, critical for SaaS |
| **Technical Readiness** | 10/10 | RBAC system complete, no migrations needed |
| **Time Feasibility** | 9/10 | 6-8 hours fits Day 6 perfectly |
| **MCP Preparation** | 7/10 | Establishes role patterns for AI agents |
| **Risk Level** | 9/10 | Low risk (builds on existing infrastructure) |
| **User Impact** | 9/10 | Enables self-service user management |
| **Dependencies Met** | 10/10 | All dependencies satisfied ✅ |
| **Test Complexity** | 8/10 | 15 tests, well-defined scenarios |
| **Documentation** | 9/10 | Clear API design, easy to document |
| **Strategic Fit** | 9/10 | Foundation for Days 8-10 |
| **TOTAL** | **89/100** | **HIGHEST SCORE** |
**Verdict**: ✅ **IMPLEMENT DAY 6**
---
### 2. Email Verification
| Criteria | Score | Justification |
|----------|-------|---------------|
| **Business Value** | 6/10 | Improves security, reduces spam |
| **Technical Readiness** | 5/10 | Needs email service integration |
| **Time Feasibility** | 6/10 | 8-10 hours (exceeds Day 6 budget) |
| **MCP Preparation** | 3/10 | Low relevance for MCP |
| **Risk Level** | 6/10 | Email delivery issues, rate limiting |
| **User Impact** | 7/10 | Standard security feature |
| **Dependencies Met** | 3/10 | Email service NOT configured ❌ |
| **Test Complexity** | 6/10 | Email delivery testing complex |
| **Documentation** | 7/10 | Standard flow, easy to document |
| **Strategic Fit** | 7/10 | Better combined with Password Reset |
| **TOTAL** | **56/100** | **2nd Place** |
**Verdict**: ⏸️ **DEFER TO DAY 7** (combine with Password Reset)
---
### 3. Password Reset
| Criteria | Score | Justification |
|----------|-------|---------------|
| **Business Value** | 7/10 | Essential UX feature, reduces support |
| **Technical Readiness** | 5/10 | Needs email service integration |
| **Time Feasibility** | 7/10 | 6-8 hours (if email service ready) |
| **MCP Preparation** | 2/10 | No relevance for MCP |
| **Risk Level** | 6/10 | Token security, rate limiting |
| **User Impact** | 8/10 | High user value (self-service) |
| **Dependencies Met** | 3/10 | Email service NOT configured ❌ |
| **Test Complexity** | 7/10 | Token expiration, security tests |
| **Documentation** | 8/10 | Standard flow, well-understood |
| **Strategic Fit** | 7/10 | Better combined with Email Verification |
| **TOTAL** | **60/100** | **3rd Place** |
**Verdict**: ⏸️ **DEFER TO DAY 7** (implement with Email Verification)
---
### 4. Project-Level Roles
| Criteria | Score | Justification |
|----------|-------|---------------|
| **Business Value** | 9/10 | Critical for M1 core project module |
| **Technical Readiness** | 5/10 | Needs architectural decisions |
| **Time Feasibility** | 4/10 | 10-12 hours (exceeds Day 6 budget) |
| **MCP Preparation** | 9/10 | Essential for MCP project operations |
| **Risk Level** | 5/10 | High complexity (role inheritance) |
| **User Impact** | 9/10 | Fine-grained project access control |
| **Dependencies Met** | 6/10 | Needs Projects module multi-tenant ❌ |
| **Test Complexity** | 5/10 | Complex (25+ tests, inheritance logic) |
| **Documentation** | 6/10 | Complex role inheritance rules |
| **Strategic Fit** | 8/10 | Foundation for M1 completion |
| **TOTAL** | **66/100** | **4th Place** |
**Verdict**: ⏸️ **DEFER TO DAY 8** (after tenant roles stable)
---
### 5. User Invitations
| Criteria | Score | Justification |
|----------|-------|---------------|
| **Business Value** | 8/10 | Improves team collaboration |
| **Technical Readiness** | 4/10 | Needs email + invitation workflow |
| **Time Feasibility** | 4/10 | 10-12 hours (too much for Day 6) |
| **MCP Preparation** | 5/10 | AI can suggest invitations (future) |
| **Risk Level** | 6/10 | Complex workflow, state management |
| **User Impact** | 8/10 | Essential for team onboarding |
| **Dependencies Met** | 3/10 | Email service + UI needed ❌ |
| **Test Complexity** | 5/10 | Workflow tests, expiration, resend |
| **Documentation** | 7/10 | Standard invitation flow |
| **Strategic Fit** | 7/10 | Better after email + roles stable |
| **TOTAL** | **57/100** | **5th Place** |
**Verdict**: ⏸️ **DEFER TO DAY 8-9** (after email service ready)
---
## Decision Matrix: Why Role Management API?
### Technical Readiness (CRITICAL)
| Feature | Database Schema | Email Service | Projects Module | RBAC System | Status |
|---------|----------------|---------------|-----------------|-------------|--------|
| **Role Management** | **✅ EXISTS** | **N/A** | **N/A** | **✅ COMPLETE** | **✅ READY** |
| Email Verification | Needs table | ❌ NOT READY | N/A | N/A | ⏸️ BLOCKED |
| Password Reset | Needs table | ❌ NOT READY | N/A | N/A | ⏸️ BLOCKED |
| Project Roles | Needs table | N/A | ❌ NOT READY | ✅ COMPLETE | ⏸️ BLOCKED |
| User Invitations | Needs table | ❌ NOT READY | N/A | ✅ COMPLETE | ⏸️ BLOCKED |
**Conclusion**: Only Role Management API has all dependencies satisfied ✅
---
### Time Feasibility (CRITICAL)
| Feature | Estimated Time | Day 6 Budget | Buffer | Fits Day 6? |
|---------|---------------|--------------|--------|-------------|
| **Role Management** | **6-8 hours** | **8 hours** | **0-2 hours** | **✅ YES** |
| Email Verification | 8-10 hours | 8 hours | -2 hours | ❌ NO |
| Password Reset | 6-8 hours | 8 hours | 0-2 hours | ⚠️ MAYBE (if email ready) |
| Project Roles | 10-12 hours | 8 hours | -4 hours | ❌ NO |
| User Invitations | 10-12 hours | 8 hours | -4 hours | ❌ NO |
**Conclusion**: Only Role Management fits 8-hour Day 6 budget ✅
---
### Business Value vs. Complexity (CRITICAL)
```
High Value, Low Complexity = IMPLEMENT FIRST ✅
High Value, High Complexity = DEFER (need more time)
Low Value, Low Complexity = OPTIONAL
Low Value, High Complexity = SKIP
HIGH VALUE
│
│ [4] Project Roles [5] Invitations
│ (Defer) (Defer)
│
│ [1] Role Mgmt ✅
│ (WINNER)
│
│ [2] Email Verify [3] Password Reset
│ (Defer) (Defer)
│
│
LOW COMPLEXITY ──────────────────── HIGH COMPLEXITY
```
**Conclusion**: Role Management is High Value + Medium Complexity = Best choice ✅
---
### Strategic Fit: Days 6-10 Pipeline
**Day 6 → Day 8 → Day 9 → Day 10 Critical Path**:
```
Day 6: Role Management API ✅
│
├─ Establishes role assignment patterns
├─ Tests authorization policies
├─ Validates RBAC system
│
↓
Day 8: Project-Level Roles
│
├─ Reuses Day 6 patterns
├─ Extends to project scope
├─ Prepares for M1 Projects
│
↓
Day 9: Multi-Tenant Projects
│
├─ Uses project roles from Day 8
├─ Completes M1.1 core features
│
↓
Day 10: Sprint Management
│
├─ Finalizes M1.1 milestone
│
↓
M1.1 COMPLETE ✅
```
**Day 7 (Parallel Track)**: Email Service + Verification + Password Reset
- Independent of critical path
- Can be implemented in parallel
- No blockers for Days 8-10
**Conclusion**: Day 6 Role Management is critical for Days 8-10 success ✅
---
## Risk vs. Value Quadrant
```
HIGH RISK
│
│ [4] Project Roles
│ (Defer to Day 8)
│
│ [5] Invitations
│ (Defer to Day 8-9)
│
│
───────┼───────────────────────
│
│ [2] Email Verify
│ [3] Password Reset
│ (Defer to Day 7)
│
│ [1] Role Mgmt ✅
│ (WINNER)
│
LOW RISK
```
**Conclusion**: Role Management is Low Risk + High Value = Safest choice ✅
---
## Final Recommendation Matrix
| Feature | Score | Readiness | Time Fit | Risk | Strategic | Verdict |
|---------|-------|-----------|----------|------|-----------|---------|
| **Role Management** | **89/100** | **✅ READY** | **✅ 6-8h** | **✅ LOW** | **✅ CRITICAL** | **✅ IMPLEMENT DAY 6** |
| Email Verification | 56/100 | ❌ Blocked | ❌ 8-10h | ⚠️ MEDIUM | ⚠️ MEDIUM | Defer to Day 7 |
| Password Reset | 60/100 | ❌ Blocked | ✅ 6-8h | ⚠️ MEDIUM | ⚠️ MEDIUM | Defer to Day 7 |
| Project Roles | 66/100 | ❌ Blocked | ❌ 10-12h | ❌ HIGH | ✅ CRITICAL | Defer to Day 8 |
| User Invitations | 57/100 | ❌ Blocked | ❌ 10-12h | ⚠️ MEDIUM | ⚠️ MEDIUM | Defer to Day 8-9 |
---
## Conclusion
**Day 6 Winner**: **Role Management API** 🏆
**Reasons**:
1. ✅ **Highest Score**: 89/100 (13 points ahead of 2nd place)
2. ✅ **Only Ready Feature**: All dependencies satisfied
3. ✅ **Perfect Time Fit**: 6-8 hours matches Day 6 budget
4. ✅ **Lowest Risk**: Builds on existing RBAC system
5. ✅ **Strategic Critical**: Required for Days 8-10 success
**Action**: Proceed with Role Management API implementation
**Next Reviews**:
- Day 7: Email Service + Verification + Password Reset
- Day 8: Project-Level Roles + Audit Logging
- Day 9-10: M1.1 completion
---
**Prepared By**: Product Manager Agent
**Date**: 2025-11-03
**Version**: 1.0
**Status**: Final Recommendation
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink