Files
knowledge-base/6 - Zettelkasten/20260319120200 MCP数量与上下文窗口的反比关系.md
Yaojia Wang 872401be72 vault: add ECC methodology deep-dive and zettelkasten insights
New resource note with 6 core methodologies, community best practices,
pitfalls, and practical examples. Three zettelkasten notes extract key
insights: hook vs prompt reliability, MCP context tradeoffs, and the
instinct learning system. Updated existing guides with cross-links.
2026-03-19 23:19:56 +01:00

29 lines
899 B
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
created: "2026-03-19 12:02"
type: zettel
tags: [claude-code, context-window, performance, mcp]
source: "https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code"
---
# MCP 数量与上下文窗口的反比关系
每个启用的 MCP Server 都会占用上下文窗口空间工具定义、schema 描述等)。实测数据:
- 0-5 个 MCP: 有效上下文接近 200K tokens
- 10+ 个 MCP: 有效上下文降至 ~70K tokens降幅 65%
**最佳实践**:
- 活跃 MCP <= 10 个,活跃工具总数 <= 80 个
-`disabledMcpServers` 动态禁用不用的
- 重操作优先用 CLI`gh`)而不是 MCP
- 使用 `llms.txt` 模式获取文档,避免 MCP 常驻开销
这是 Claude Code 性能优化中**最重要的单一因素** — 比任何 Agent 或 Skill 都重要。
---
## Related
- [[Everything Claude Code 方法论与最佳实践]]
- [[Hook驱动优于提示词驱动]]